This is a silly article This article is silly. Coming from a source other than the computer games, trading card game, novels, RPG, or manga, its content is not part of official Warcraft lore, but nevertheless has become part of the culture belonging to the World of Warcraft community. |
Female armor tends to cover less than does male armor. While this is clearly not for defense, it makes the boys come to the yard. Many players with male avatars have complained that they aren't getting fair treatment, but some enterprising and imaginative artists have proposed changes to level the playing field.
Chest items[]
Leg items[]
Sets[]
Item | Level range |
---|---|
Black Mageweave collection | 36-41 |
67 | |
60 | |
35-39 | |
50-56 | |
50-56 | |
41-48 | |
32-34 | |
45-52 | |
46-52 | |
44-49 | |
40 | |
49-53 | |
40-43 | |
47-54 |
Media[]
Males In female armor[]
This is how Warcraft male characters, leaders and NPCs might look in female armor:
Notes[]
- Not so silly section
- Many people see this as mere fanservice, while others see it as just following game industry cultural norms which is designed to appeal to teenage boys.[citation needed] Unfortunately, even WoWWiki has been victimized by this normal perspective and has been called out for it.[1] There is little practical value in many of the revealing features in female armor. Fortunately, there has been some evidence this situation may be improving.[2]
References[]
- ^ Becky Chambers 2012-04-10. For Anyone Still Wondering, Yes, Women Can Wear Full Armor, Too. TheMarySue.com.
- ^ Becky Chambers 2012-05-22. Well, At Least the Gameplay is Fun: Gender and Storytelling in Diablo III. TheMarySue.com. “Considering how the female armor models in World of Warcraft have been steadily improving...”