I see you reverted my edit with no explanation. So why isn't a lichling a Lich when on the Lich page it says as much? Rolandius 
(talk - contr) 01:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
It seems to have been speculation (it can be tricky) based on the name.[1] Be careful not to let false info multiply. It also does not use the model.--User:Sandwichman2448/Sig 01:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ok well how do I know it isn't correct info since it was on the page and no one said anything. Rolandius
(talk - contr) 01:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- There is no way. Well, no way other than citation (which can be rare for non-RPG info) or if you find it out firsthand. Use good judgement. It is tricky. I mess that type of thing up myself sometimes.--User:Sandwichman2448/Sig 01:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)