Are we including "named" and "types" in articles? I thought it was only "named" because a creature could have so many "types" that it would fill the page up. Rolandius 
(talk - contr) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- There are so few both are fine, I guess.--User:Sandwichman2448/Sig 03:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)