I'm concerned that this current page is not representative of Theorycraft as a whole. While certainly the statements made do happen, the author seems to portray this as an infantile process. Many of the topics on Wowwiki are a direct result of Theorycraft and the understanding that has come with it. Perhaps a more neutral article focusing on the topic, positives and negatives, etc would be more beneficial? I am going to rewrite this page and see about giving appropriate consideration to both arguments.
FuzzicalLogic (talk) 02:57, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Up for Preliminary Review[]
I've expanded the article considerably and addressed the concerns of the previous author, as well. There is still some elaboration and clarification necessary for this to be a useful article. I will work more on it in the morning, but if there are any comments, please feel free to let me know.
FuzzicalLogic (talk) 06:30, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
[]
Now that I'm almost finished with this article, I feel that this can be a useful hub for those interested in the topic. I do feel, however, that the categorization and navigation of the Theory, mechanics, terms, and formulae topics is a little convoluted given the amount of content in these categories. I propose undertaking a reorganization of these topics and some additions of some navigation templates to streamline the navigation and research for other members. This could potentially affect articles in other pages, so I would really like some feedback as to some ways we could accomplish this without breaking the rest of the wiki. I'd also like toknow if some others feel the way that I do, and if so, discuss some recommendations.
FuzzicalLogic (talk) 06:34, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Please read my response at Category talk:World of Warcraft theory, before undertaking the creation of new catgeories. --
Fandyllic (talk · contr) 8 Apr 2011 4:01 PM Pacific