Chinese-only patches
As they applied only to Chinese translations and therefore weren't released in non-Chinese regions (and have no English wiki page), should 2.0.9, 2.0.11, and 2.1.4 perhaps be removed from this template? It's a little confusing for them to be present and unlinked while 2.0.0 and 2.0.2 are missing entirely if one hasn't actually gone and researched the patches. // DarkRyder / 
/ 
// 02:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- If we know about the patches (USA release or not) they should be here -- People make mistakes and miss things on ocasion - if you see a missing patch add it in (just do so proplerly is all that is asked). -- (M o r p h | C | T)
16:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
New template design (if you like)
If you like this - copy it over -- (M o r p h | C | T) 
16:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Moved to Forum:Template: Patches - new design
Most recent patch
I just reverted Howbitzer editing for italicized the most recent patch. Please don't revert it again, you shouldn't have favoritism over the most recent patch. The largest number "3.2.0" is already self-explanatory. --Ramu50 (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
C) 03:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
